Sunday 27 September 2026 · data as of the 27 Sep · 12:30 check · all times UTCPractice only · no trades are placed

Receipts

What crypto analysts said, what the market showed when they said it, and what happened next.

All calls · @Finora_EN's record

@Finora_EN on BR

Not scored The account was retired from collection, so its calls are kept on file but not followed backfilled

26 Sep · 07:15
📉 $BR 2.2x volume pop is a squeeze into supply, not accumulation - my bias is bearish here on the 1h — that 2.2x volume pop and the +3.1% burst look like a squeeze into supply around 0.921, not clean accumulation, and they do not override the confirmed lower-high / lower-low structure while BTC is also bearish - this is a counter-trend move versus bullish daily and weekly structure, so I demand a clear rejection or lower-timeframe shift before treating any short as high-quality - I expect a first push toward 0.770 then a test of the 0.7468 swing-low liquidity, with 0.6135 only if that low is taken and held below - short entry zone: 0.90–0.921 on a failed reclaim of that supply — wait for a pin / bearish engulfing or a 5–15m market-structure shift lower before entering; do not chase the spike - take profits in order: 0.770 then 0.7468 - place protection beyond the structure flip / last swing high, not at an arbitrary price - a close above 1.17400 flips this 1h bias to bullish and invalidates the short idea 📉 📊 Flow: OI $25.3M (-30.2% 24h) · funding +0.0002% · taker 1.05×
6 levels on one axis

Levels against price

0.6135target 0.7468target 0.770target 0.90–0.921entry 0.921resistance 1.17400invalidation
Linear price axis, $0.5799 to $1.21.

6 levels stated

BR bear

Written as
“$BR”
Conviction
firm
Kind
forward call
Status
Not scored

Stated invalidation. “a close above 1.17400 flips this 1h bias to bullish and invalidates the short idea”

Levels exactly as written; the reading is shown where it isn't obvious
RoleLevel as writtenTimeframe
resistance 0.921 1h
target 0.770 = $0.77 —
target 0.7468 —
target 0.6135 —
entry 0.90–0.921 = $0.9–$0.921 —
invalidation 1.17400 = $1.17 1h
4 reasons stated

Why the analyst said it

  • my bias is bearish here on the 1h
  • that 2.2x volume pop and the +3.1% burst look like a squeeze into supply around 0.921, not clean accumulation
  • they do not override the confirmed lower-high / lower-low structure
  • I expect a first push toward 0.770 then a test of the 0.7468 swing-low liquidity, with 0.6135 only if that low is taken and held below

Not checked: there is no priced market evidence from the moment this was posted.

no snapshot

At posting backfilled

Collected before tracking began. Posting-time evidence does not exist for this post.

26 Sep · 10:00

Since posting Not scored

Not scored: the account was retired from collection, so its calls are kept on file but not followed.

Monitoring from
—
Baseline
not yet observed
Horizon ends
28 Sep · 07:15
Last check
26 Sep · 09:45

Monitoring began after the post. If price crossed a level before then, the crossing was not observed and its order is unknown, so it is not counted.

sha256

Where this came from

source x_api · sha256 c8f7061951ebf480… · claim 2103745333855453257#0